Spotify Denies Recent Accusation That It Changed Its Terms For Artists

This week, Spotify publically addressed misinformation circulating astir its position of use.

The consequence was prompted by videos from creators, specified arsenic creator @chantmagick, which accused Spotify of modifying its position and conditions to licence nan transportation of authorities to artists’ euphony to 3rd parties, including partners, affiliates, and tech providers.

Spotify issued a nationalist statement this week, clarifying that these claims are mendacious and reassuring users that these updated position do not impact nan distribution authorities of artists, podcasters, creators, and authors regarding their music, shows, and audiobooks.

Instead, these position use to listeners. The position let Spotify to “display features specified arsenic user-created civilization playlist covers, personification comments connected podcasts, and user-created playlist titles,” nan institution wrote. It’s reasonably communal for streaming platforms and euphony services to usage user-generated content.

The euphony streaming elephantine continues to look important disapproval regarding its curen of artists, pinch galore alleging that they person insufficient compensation for their activity connected nan platform. Last year, Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib and Congressman Jamaal Bowman projected nan Living Wage for Musicians Act, which intends to summation streaming royalties to 1 cent per stream.

Despite these concerns, Spotify asserts that its payments are improving, stating it paid retired $10 billion to nan euphony manufacture successful 2024.