New Research Links Gerrymandering To Reduced Healthcare Services

Trending 3 days ago

A University of Massachusetts Amherst study has recovered that gerrymandering successful North Carolina resulted successful reduced entree to healthcare services. As states crossed nan state grapple pinch politically charged redistricting efforts, the uncovering could yet connection a caller strategy to conflict gerrymandering successful nan courts, nan researchers say.

"Access to healthcare should not beryllium limited connected which statement is successful power," says Auden Cote-L'Heureux, lead writer of nan insubstantial published Nov. 13 successful the American Journal of Public Health, which besides issued an editorial piece on nan research. "Healthcare should beryllium protected from governmental whims." 

Cote-L'Heureux, a caller UMass Amherst postgraduate now studying for a master's grade astatine nan University of Bonn successful Germany, carried retired nan investigation pinch elder author David Chin, adjunct professor of wellness argumentation and guidance successful the School of Public Health and Health Sciences. 

They analyzed electoral, demographic and wellness halfway information to analyse really gerrymandering whitethorn impact entree to a federally qualified wellness center (FQHC), which provides superior and preventive healthcare services sloppy of nan expertise to pay.

Redistricting is nan constitutionally mandated believe of redrawing electoral districts arsenic populations displacement to guarantee adjacent practice successful nan national House of Representatives and authorities legislative bodies. Gerrymandering, connected nan different hand, is nan redrawing of electoral districts to use a governmental statement aliases candidate; nan existent Supreme Court has made gerrymandering difficult to litigate successfully, isolated from successful peculiar cases wherever it violates nan Voting Rights Act.

"This is possibly not nan first, but I deliberation nan astir rigorous appraisal of this elemental mobility – does this practice [created by gerrymandering] construe into either bully aliases harm?" says Chin. "You tin usage publically disposable information to infer governmental determinants of health."

The researchers examined ZIP codes arsenic a proxy for communities. A ZIP codification divided betwixt 2 aliases much legislative districts was considered highly gerrymandered, whereas a ZIP codification that lies wholly aliases mostly wrong a azygous territory is mostly little gerrymandered. The researchers besides utilized precocious developed techniques that allowed them to find nan grade to which each individual elector is artificially "dislocated" from like-minded voters, different measurement of measuring gerrymandering.

We find that ZIP codes that were much gerrymandered betwixt 2004 and 2022 had less federally qualified wellness centers successful 2022 and were little apt to summation wellness centers betwixt 2004 and 2022. In addition, those communities had less patients visiting those wellness centers successful 2022."

Auden Cote-L'Heureux, lead writer of nan paper

The researchers noted that residents successful communities divided evenly betwixt 2 authorities legislature districts during nan 18-year play had to recreation astir 30% farther to their nearest FQHC successful 2022 than individuals successful communities lying wholly wrong a azygous district. Greater gerrymandering severity of authorities legislature districts was linked pinch up to a 29% simplification successful nan number of FQHCs. 

"These findings are accordant pinch nan presumption that gerrymandering weakens section governmental practice and tin lead to reduced entree to captious healthcare services - a structural rumor pinch far-reaching implications for wellness equity and nationalist argumentation reform," nan researchers wrote. 

Cote-L'Heureux notes that the Supreme Court ruled successful 2019 that partisan gerrymandering - gerrymandering to favour a statement - cannot beryllium contested successful nan national courts because it constitutes a "non-justiciable governmental question." 

Chin and Cote-L'Heureux opportunity their findings could connection a perchance legally sound measurement to title gerrymandering. "There hasn't been a compelling statement successful our existent Supreme Court's sentiment arsenic to really to measurement gerrymandering's harm, and our investigation provides a measurement of measuring its harm," Cote-L'Heureux says.

Chin agrees. "This is simply a beautiful clear illustration of nan narration betwixt governmental practice arsenic it translates to individuals receiving healthcare astatine FQHCs," Chin says. "We person laid nan groundwork, nan empirical pieces, for group who are willing successful this."

Interactive Map: https://audencote.github.io/NCInteractiveMap/ 

Click connected each region to spot nan magnitude that each ZIP codification successful North Carolina is gerrymandered by existent authorities House districts, according to nan partisan dislocation metric. Blue indicates gerrymandering successful favour of Democrats, and reddish successful favour of Republicans. 

Source:

Journal reference:

Cote-L’Heureux, A. E. & Chin, D.L. (2025). Political Boundaries, Health Care Gaps: The Link Between Gerrymandering and Federally Qualified Health Center Availability. American Journal of Public Health. doi: 10.2105/ajph.2025.308284. https://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/abs/10.2105/AJPH.2025.308284

More